Budget Crunches Lead to "Back Door Accident Taxes; It's Time to Say No

To offset declining governmental budgets, some local communities are seeking to build new revenue streams by instituting accident response fees that are charged when police or fire fighters respond to a traffic accident. However, public safety is a basic role of government paid for by property and other local taxes. 

In those communities where accident response fees are charged, it is unwise public policy to require additional funding for first-responders when the public is already paying for these services.  Since local municipalities calculate their tax structure based on the services provided, adding charge backs as a source of revenue is a form of double taxation.  In other words, the accident response fees levied by local governments on their constituents amount to nothing more than redundant "back door" taxes. 

Help us warn other drivers by spreading the word about these fees. Sign up to help fight the Accident Tax!

States Enact Crash Tax Bans; 13 Overall
There are 13 states that have taken positive steps to protect motorists by banning or placing restrictions on local governments charging accident response fees (Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Utah).

We applaud the governors and lawmakers for responding to the strong public opposition to this new trend of charging accident response fees. Ultimately these fees are a back-door tax that most consumers believe are unnecessary. The crash tax adds insult to injury by victimizing drivers twice - once by being in an unfortunate accident and then again with a fee. Then when you add the potential negative impact on local businesses, charging for emergency services is simply a bad public policy option for local governments.

Fire Chief Magazine Discusses Why Crash Taxes Ultimately are Bad for the Fire Service
A very interesting perspective on Crash Taxes from Fire Chief Magazine.  Jim Spell writing in the Mutual Aid Blog discusses his concerns about accident response fees from the fire service perspective.  Spell recognizes that finances for some municipalities and fire departments may be tight but an accident tax or crash tax may not be in their best long-term interest. "This ‘on-scene service fee' may be the first nail in the public fire-protection coffin," said Spell. Read More>>

Americans Express Strong Opposition to being Charged for Accident Response Services
A Harris Poll shows 76% of U.S. adults believe their taxes cover the time and services provided by emergency response providers following a traffic accident. As a result, they believe additional accident response fees charged by local governments are not necessary.

According to this survey, only one-third of adults believe charging these fees are appropriate. The opposition to charging these fees grows to 66 percent if it were to lead to an increase in the cost of insurance and 70 percent if only non-residents are charged the fee. The survey also found that charging accident response fees could also have a significant impact on local businesses and tourism, as more than four in ten adults reported they would be reluctant to travel in towns that assess such fees. Read More>>   Survey Findings>>

AccidentTax.com is a Web site opposed to the practice of municipalities charging accident response fees when police or fire department personnel respond to a traffic accident. The role of the police and fire department should be to serve and protect not serve and collect. An additional fee for emergency services creates a hidden tax - we call it the "Accident Tax" or "Crash Tax."